NEWS & UPDATES

Stay informed.
Stay connected.

Curated coverage of data centers, transmission projects, zoning decisions and community response across the Poconos.

Pike County · Monroe County · PennsylvaniaExplore the coverage ↓

START HERE

Three perspectives on what’s changing close to home.

ON THE CALENDAR

Meetings & deadlines

As reported September 5, 2026. Check the source before making plans.

DEP comment deadline

Bushkill Falls–Birchwood Lakes transmission segment

Courier permit coverage ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Smithfield Gateway hearing

6:00 PM · J.T. Lambert Intermediate School

Township notice ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Possible continuation

Reserved date for the Smithfield conditional-use hearing

Township notice ↗ (opens in a new tab)

THE FULL FEED

Follow what matters to you.

Browse all 17 selected articles. Original reporting opens on the publisher’s site in a new tab.

17 articles · Newest first

External Feature

Is this the future of America? (opens in a new tab)

Loudoun County’s data-center growth brought major tax benefits—and debate over noise, power lines and development pressure. A look at the tradeoffs after years of expansion.

Outside case study: Loudoun County, Virginia. This is context for the Poconos, not a local project report.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)
External Reporting

Committee votes on Sen. Brown’s statewide data center moratorium amendment (opens in a new tab)

State Sen. Rosemary Brown proposed a three-year statewide moratorium on hyperscale data-center development, arguing that Pennsylvania needs time to address unresolved questions involving energy demand, water use, infrastructure, environmental impacts, and community planning.

The proposed three-year moratorium amendment failed 2–9 in committee, according to this report. It did not become a statewide moratorium.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)
External Reporting

Bresnahan’s proposed legislation aims to keep control local over data center development decisions (opens in a new tab)

U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan introduced legislation aimed at protecting municipalities that reject data-center proposals from costly federal litigation while also encouraging local workforce commitments when projects are approved.

Proposed federal legislation; this is not a statement that these protections are already law.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)
External Reporting

FirstEnergy’s Shawnee-Walker 69kV transmission-line project (opens in a new tab)

Pike County residents gathered in Delaware Township to organize opposition to FirstEnergy’s Shawnee–Walker transmission project, circulate petitions, and raise concerns about property impacts, land clearing, eminent domain, and the project’s necessity.

This is reporting on community opposition. Claims by organizers are attributed to them, not independently verified here.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)Current project record →
Community report · Unverified

Possible Data Center in Pike? (opens in a new tab)

A community post raised questions about whether a large DEPG-owned property near Route 739 in Dingman Township could someday be repurposed for data-center development, particularly as new electrical infrastructure is considered nearby.

Community report · Unverified. This post republishes Facebook speculation. No public application, announced operator or confirmed data-center plan was identified in the sources reviewed for this property.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)Current project record →
External Reporting

Board of Supervisors discusses proposed FirstEnergy transmission line project (opens in a new tab)

Dingman Township supervisors heard resident concerns about the Shawnee–Walker project, including possible effects on private property, environmental resources, electricity rates, and questions from residents about whether future industrial or data-center development could benefit from the added capacity.

Residents’ speculation about future warehouses or AI facilities is not evidence that Shawnee–Walker was designed specifically for data centers.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)Current project record →
External Reporting

What we know about Smithfield Gateway data center proposal (opens in a new tab)

An early look at the Smithfield Gateway data center proposal, including how data-center development became part of the long-planned commercial site and what the initial concept looked like when it reached local review.

Plans have changed since this article was published. Its earlier two-building concept was superseded by the August 2026 revision: one two-story building, approximately 500,000 sq. ft. total, a 250,000 sq. ft. footprint and proposed 250 MW load. See the current project record below.

Read at source (opens in a new tab)Current project record →

Our summaries provide context; the original reporting belongs to its publishers. Community reports are labeled separately. MonroeCountyPA.com is independent media, not a county government website. For current proposal details, consult our sourced project tracker →

THE WVIA SERIES

Data Centers: Deal or Dilemma?

Three connected stories. Start with the water, follow the power, then hear from the communities weighing the tradeoffs.

LESSONS FROM ELSEWHERE

LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Is this the future
of America?

Loudoun County’s data-center growth brought major tax benefits—and debate over noise, power lines and development pressure. A look at the tradeoffs after years of expansion.

Read the feature at The Verge (opens in a new tab)

KEEP THE COMMUNITY CONNECTED

Know something we should be tracking?

Documents, local reporting and public notices help build a clearer picture.
Tip submissions aren’t open yet. We’ll add a contact destination here when it’s ready.